Not sure what changes were made, but I decided to give nostr:npub1cm3rpgj7457yjuqnvdalxaauakqu0ndkpkyp5cldkyutpz4xszpsmk96wt another try and was impressed with how it handled small amounts.

I was able to receive two small payments and then empty the wallet with a “Send Max” button. Previously, there was friction around a 1000-sat minimum.

Now my question is: are there any plans to support LNURL-verify?

Keep up the great work. 🤙

nostr:nevent1qqs9ggkqkgy85d7qdv778m5g8r2yrzwy0dtcz9l5g3nu555wqdt44nqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgcd4t2y

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We added LNURL verify and then services started to spam our backend, so we removed it. We are going to try and add it back in with rate limiting this time.

That would be awesome. Thanks. 🤙

What plans do you have for lnurl verify?

I use it a lot for e-commerce (i.e. to redirect to a thank you/order confirmation page once payment has been received). I usually poll every few seconds with a max timeout, so hopefully that’s something that’ll be ok with the rate limiting.

It’ll be good to have another option to suggest to merchants when I’m helping them build a site. I checked out Misty Breez but their fees seem a bit high (e.g. there was a 48-sat fee for a 100-sat receive).

Anyways, please keep me posted so I can add you to the list of LNURL-verify supporters. 🤙

nostr:note1dsexdh96l2ud0ew9cuhhu0avqqt9wwjxjn3km837g3xnyag09e4s2tad2k