I know we love zaps but as far as I am aware zaps can be faked. If I am wrong please correct me. If I am correct, then I think people ought to be aware of this, because the passion and excitement for zaps leads people to think of new uses for zaps that presume zaps are trustworthy. If zaps can be faked, then things built with zaps must take this into consideration.

The reason I bring this up is not only for awareness but also because I do not think zaps are the end-all-be-all of value measurement online.

For example, proof of work cannot be faked and it is way less complicated than zaps — it can be entirely contained within a single event and no additional software is needed to make it work. Unlike throwing generational wealth at each other 37 sats at a time trying to take down custodial wallet providers, proof of work is an efficient and verifiable way. Instead of spending bitcoin, you can spend time and energy to create signal. It isn't really being used, but it could be.

I like zaps. I like proof of work. I've tried zaps. I'd like to try proof of work.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I haven’t come across fake zaps yet but fake Cashu nuts I rug pulled myself of Sats learning experience!!

I saw a note that had over 1BTC zapped. Pretty sure it was fake. It was a long time ago. I'm not sure if I could find it. But even reading the zap spec I was thinking there seems to be plenty of room for fakery. Zaps were not necessarily meant to be a cryptographically secure record of a lightning tx, but some people perceive them to be just as reliable.

That was 99% Sailor doing Sailor stuff

It can only be faked by the receiver of a zap. 🐶🐾🫡

Spending energy on mobile devices which majority of users interact with nostr is out of the question. Nostr apps already consume most of phones battery and we don't need additional drainer.

You don't have to do it