Bitcoin already is a global currency.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#[5]​ Bitcoin or…? No. Bitcoin

It’s 95% dominant

It is, but like all good innovations, if it’s not used then it defeats the purpose of built.

What’s missing in Bitcoin is heavy money circulation esp import/export trade, and local adoption buy and sell worldwide.

And until then, the cold harsh truth is that Bitcoin relies on emotions and market sentiments . Maybe not as evident as every altcoin because of its higher value, but stuff like ordinal NFTs which taps into madness of the crowd and pump and dump is the complete opposite of the ethos of Bitcoin. Same for Saylor, buying and holding in hopes market sentiments pushes it up is not the healthiest move. Historically you’ve seen the risk of pump and dump - south sea bubble, Mississippi company, tulip bubble

Using Bitcoin as money would help people lean in as global currency. Further deriving from Bitcoin as monetary usage, one important benefit would be digitalising small businesses and small manufacturers globally and that’s one big opportunity and answer in reducing hegemony trade dependency

conversations around currency is largely pointless in the global economic outlook until resource backing is determined. as long as economies pretend digital data is not the current "currency backer" propping up the stakeholder model, it's only a matter of time before it all collapses. the only reason it's maintained the front for this long is because of secrecy, jargon gatekeeping, and off-books margins. without property, proof of work, or physical assets, very little will economically matter in 25 years.

Agreed