Better to do on solana than bitcoin. Saylor has protected Bitcoin as money so far. I remember him getting some heat about not wanting to fund developers a while back. Well it’s the developers, not saylor, that want to pile more “features” into Bitcoin.

The results of funding devs rain or shine has been a mistake.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

funding open source = bad

promoting shitcoins = good

- jdwagner17

That doesn't seem fair... Open SATs / open spurce is building bitcoin infrastructure and products not trying to change bitcoin via "features". That's a big difference on my opinion

I didn’t mention them.

Good intentions are not enough.

How much was Satoshi paid?

“To listen well is as powerful a means of influence as to talk well, and is as essential to all true conversation.”

Odell bringing those Xitter vibes over to Nostr

It’s abundantly clear he was right despite the cope