I'm not enough into the dev side. I beleive that podcasts like nostr:nprofile1qqsqe5q08p3g78h3x4epm7fajkz2gremkt858a5dxq0sy8wkx8r5l2cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmq3s6fdd tries the keep the community informed and still tries to keep the devs pseudomized/anonymous.

But, looking at other projects where lead devs has suddenly changed the direction of a project without real opposition. Or skilled and well funded devs suddenly join in and take over a project. Is a lesson to be take seriously.

I think that:

- No dev should ever be able to rely on their status/authority. Only the case/code they present should have any validity.

- Open communication and debate of almost everything. Major decisions taken by the few without check'n balance, is by it self a vulnerability.

- Minimize economic bribes or conflict of interest. By ex. dev stakes, futures or options.

But, I'm actually relatively unaware of precisely things are setup now. To prevent corruption of devs or code.