Replying to Avatar NoeBoties_Fool

I thought, when nostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev noted that each additional chain would require a soft fork, that eventually miners and side chains could guild togethere to make a political barrier to entry by guild protectionism. Possibility?

Technically it isn’t a full one soft fork, more of a MASF that requires much less coordination from nodes, only users who want to use the sidechain need to worry about it.

It doesn’t really change my more pressing concerns but it’s worth clarifying that it’s not exactly that way despite needing coordination.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

ahhh.... makes more sense then.