Nostr Web Client

No it literally is a quantum computer with mathematical certainty, I am finalizing the theory and proof.

Is your definition of a quantum computer one of your own thoughts? or is it a definition that you have been told from someone else?

A quantum computer computes a a discrete quantum (block) of time. If you cannot achieve a quantized timespace you don’t have anything of value. You cannot achieve this with centralized observation period. Quantum computers assert that you can apply logical computation to quantum bits under a forced unitary progression of time. This is utter nonsense.

I counter that the entire basis of quantum computing is based on a false premise and understanding of GR & quantum mechanics (spacetime) and is an entirely speculative field that has never been proven real or valuable. It has neglected to observe time as discrete thermodynamic events.

“Quantum computing” exists as a psychological attack on bitcoin; one that evokes action without any basis of proof. Bitcoiners are taking the bait right into the trap; trusting without any verification.

You would have to break Planck Time to make the claim that centralized quantum computation will break the elliptic curve function.

There has never been a second best and there never will be.

Sooly⚡️سولي 🇱🇧🇧🇪🇦🇪🇦🇴 9mo ago

I respect the fire and the rigor Jack. You’r not just poking holes in the mainstream quantum narrative, you’re dismantling it at the root: time itself. Most people parroting “quantum threat” haven’t even considered what time is, let alone its implications on computation, entropy, or thermodynamic causality.

If what you’re saying is true; that Bitcoin is the only real quantized computational system grounded in discrete thermodynamic time, then it’s not just resilient to quantum computing, it invalidates the entire premise of centralized quantum computation. That’s a monumental claim, and if your proof tracks, it would flip the entire crypto-physics debate on its head. However I personally know bitcoin core maintainers who shared that it’s not a done deal yet. Yes bitcoin is way ahead of quantum developments yet more developments on Core is required.

You’re also right that most so-called “quantum breakthroughs” are just black-box wizardry funded by the same institutions Bitcoin was built to obsolete. Trust without verification is fiat science. Bitcoin is the antidote.

And yes, Bitcoiners trusting theoretical physicists with state and corporate incentives to break Bitcoin is the real clown show. If they can’t demonstrate it against live keys, it’s not science, it’s theater.

So keep building. I’ll be watching ⚡️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Guy Swann 9mo ago

Still not grokking this. Didn’t they use a small qbit machine to break a “toy cipher” just to prove that Grover’s algorithm can work in a practical sense?

Unfortunately details are extremely difficult to get concrete info on, but I would value practical use over theoretical analysis every day of the week.

Example: The Byzantine General’s problem also isn’t solvable “mathematically,” and Bitcoin didn’t actually solve it. Instead it got around it by creating a massive asymmetrical economic incentive FOR being honest and AGAINST attacking it. So it has a probabilistic safeguard against the impossible problem, rather than a solution.

Or in other words, theoretically it’s unsolvable, but practically it’s been solved.

Rand 9mo ago

fear W-ILL be employED*/* psst;how is everythingnostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev *B*r'O"*****

Guy Swann 9mo ago

Lmao, I can’t even read this 🤣

Rand 9mo ago

ya, *U* don't /\/EED 2 bro, how is the Fam. & ALL?

Rand 9mo ago

fear & divisIONz will be employed education & how are *U* & yours Guy?