even fragmentation used in this context starts from a paradigm of centralization.
but cellular grouping and morphic waxing and waning of different grouping points is natural in any free system.
the real challenge is long term, interoperable consensus of the base protocol.
There is no consensus, or global state on nostr, it is by design, any kind of verification is through the verification of the event signature itself. I'm not sure how we keep circling back to the "global state" argument.
incorrect.
without consensus on how the base protocol operates, there is no nostr.
Ahh my bad, I thought you meant consensus in the global state of events. But you mean consensus in what the protocol means itself, yes, that's going to be interesting to follow, that's a challenge we've seen with bitcoin as well.
oh gosh. yeah. i dont think that kind of “consensus” has ever been achieved in human history 👍
