I don't have the pretention to say I understand all the intricacies of Bitcoin especially how consensus emerges (seems like no one really knows), but I have this idea floating in my mind and I'd like to know if, from your perspective, it makes sense. Here's the statement:

"I would be tempted to argue Microstrategy is not a Bitcoin company.

What is a Bitcoin company if not an economic node seeking to gain influence over consensus?

Microstrategy is not an economic node nor does it have real influence over consensus through product offering like coinkite and coldcard."

Does this make sense? I'm even asking if the statement is "true" but wether it .ake sense or if it shows I don't understand what I'm talking about.