Look, I may give privacy nyms a hard time for shaming noobs and employing divisive rhetoric, but the truth we would be fucked without them.

We *need* the open source, noncustodial #Lightning experience to match or beat the closed custodial experience seen in #[0].

Bitcoiners will go to great lengths to secure their life savings using open source tools like Sparrow, but for #Nostr zaps the best UX is simply going to win.

This is a big deal. We can never let #Bitcoin become cuck money. Care mad is still care.

I respect what #[1], #[2], and the other privacy nyms bring to the table. We all should.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Custodians don’t solve the KYC mandates that governments currently impose on fiat money

I’m optimistic about cashu but it still involves custodians

Privacy is the most important aspect of Bitcoin to keep it a tool for freedom. Anyone doing any work in this area in my mind is crucial and we should be listening to their criticism as it is in our own best interest.

Yes.

👊 All on the same team here, thankful for what you're doing as well!

As long as they leave Monero off the table, I'm willing to listen

🙄

No one's even talking about Monero here 😂

Bc Bitcoin is 👑

cringe

Yes, shitcoiners are the definition of cringe.

Cringe is caring more about "muh gains" than privacy and civil liberties.

Cringe is being a naive shitcoiner & thinking Bitcoin can never have those things you seek on other layers.

Do they at the moment?

*Does it

Bitcoin is already cuck money. Most people only care about NGU. People will go where there’s the least friction and that is currently custodial solutions and exchanges. Until something noncustodial and easy comes about it will never change. Humans are lazy

Just checked my node, says you're a cuck.

Did #[7]​ give you permission to say that. Naughty naughty.

Who the fuck is Jack?