Bitcoiners: “Don’t reuse bitcoin addresses.”

Bitwise:

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Don't reuse addresses if you value privacy*

This. If your goal is on chain transparency, a single address or exposed xpub is the way to go.

Issa joke ya dildos

Single sig ? 🤣 written on a piece of paper in the owners office

what I did in very early days as a newbie🫡

Seriously, can you AI prompt a better: Give me waspy, trust-fund investment banker profile! 😂

A legacy address? Did they create this with bitaddress.org?

😂😂

Who's the first one to dust the address with contraband bitcoin?

lol apparently there have been some people sending sats to it today 🤦‍♂️😅

Inscriptions have been inscribed

Phew now they all have paper ordinals

Yeah i don’t really get it. I’m pretty sure if you inscribe sats on that address, bitwise owns those ordinals. Unless it’s even dumber than i thought

😭

I hope they were “rare” ordinals lol

For anyone who doesn’t know, this is how we created paper wallets back in the day.

I remember like it was yesterday lol 🤣

If you are going to send bitcoin to random address, send it here. I will keep it safe from blackrock

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1078x1694&blurhash=%5EBFYx%5Day00ay00j%5B00ay-%3Bj%5B_3j%5BM_j%5Ba%23fPxtWB%7Eqayofj%5BIUof-%3DayIUWBWCof4nj%5Bxtj%5BxuRjE1WBt6j%5Bflof.8j%5BadWBWXof%25Mj%5BM%7Bj%5BRjWB&x=f075b383b511812a61fe78a44ff22038d64f7c4d84a8644686364a027010728e

No caso deles eles vão receber muitas doações e ganhar mais Bitcoins

Send one sat and entirely throw off their accounting system.

This is good for bitcoin

When you start using the same private key to sign multiple transactions, isn't a security issue over time? Wouldn't be safer of they provided a zpub since the zpriv has more entropy?

They are not so "wise"... should rename in BitDumb

Seems fine, its good to be able to see that the ETF actually have the funds. You can't cash out btc so they're not going to blow anyone privacy by sending to them either.