Say you will include that point in the article, and that currently there is no "they", but it is possible that Damus and Amethyst will try to charge.

The novel thing here is not the app developers, it's the underlying platform.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks. I’ve tried adding that.

Yeah they keep coming back to the point that Damus is a product and me publishing a pro Damus article is promotional. I’m like it’s a protocol; it’s similar to an article celebrating btc hitting 25k.

I’m trying a different angle

I think if they're hung up on that, maybe you could promote the plethora of the clients that have sprouted up over the past few months to make it seems less promotional to a specific client, or just talk about the user #s, how LN is being integrated & some of the features of the protocol without naming any of the clients.

Nice. Yeah I’m pitching other angles

Lemme know if you need any tips/ideas 🤙

Damus is the product. Might want to incorporate more clients into your article like Iris and nostrgram to not seem promotional or biased.