yeah, i guess this is it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

VCs cant make money from nostr so unlikely will anytime soon.

this is very true

but building nsec keys from mnemonic is already doable on wallets like tokenpocket so i guess metamask support is just a matter of time

As I said, if there is interest it someone will build it. Monero community seem to be quite popular on nostr but no idea of they are building their own client or not.

while that is true, building a monero based signer will be vety difficult (unlike nostr) and will be against their privacy spirit.

even on LN, the one that are building the infras are the custodian wallets. the non custodian cant adopt nostr or zap yet

unlike LN*

I believe or seen something about or called cake wallet for monero

Thats a wallet not a nostr client.

I think there’s a bounty out for a client that uses xmr or ln for zapping and yeah im pretty sure a implementation like current using cake wallet. And metamask is only like 1 step away.

That might be a good way to help onboard more users to nostr even if I dont agree with their investment choices.

Agreed. I’m not sure why an open protocol like nostr only started with the ln when the devs could have built a multi crypto wallet selector?

1. Because the devs dont consider other coins as legitimate form of investment

2. Because most multi crypto wallet are in fact a distinct implementation from LN. LN is not a blockchain. It is in fact a Bitcoin L2 with different architecture

3. Why should bitcoin focused dev focus on building other wallet support for an open source protocol. If the other wallet like, they can always make way for adoption

4. Because vc are not interested. They cant monetize their ponzi on nostr.

Maxis gotta I’ve em no?