Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Mike Dilger ☑️

Because I don't have your lived experience I'm not familiar with the harrassment/hate. I'm sorry to hear about it. But I take it very seriously, and so I want to escalate implementing reporting and labelling features in the gossip client. These are defined in NIP-32 and NIP-56. We have a lot on our plate so it may be two versions out, but we didn't even have it slated previously.

I once said I called my client 'gossip' because I thought it would be more appealing to women. That comment was not received well by some women. I'm terribly sorry to have such an ignorant man-brain that thought women gossip more than men. I said what I thought was true, but I guess I was wrong, and I'm sorry.

Avatar
freecritter 1y ago 💬 2

nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c - what features are possible besides block? Is it based on WoT that would reduce the need to block? For instance a user could set a threshold of at least 20 or could it be that a minimal zap amount is set?

I ask because I'm only aware of muting so curious what else you could do with your client.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Mike Dilger ☑️ 1y ago

People could subscribe to a censor. Then if that censor issues a 1984 event, the client could mute that event.

Avatar
Crash Test Dummy 1y ago

That seems so George Orwell-ian.

Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed