For the simple reason that they check out. Is it a falsehood that it causes a latency in synching with the network because a node with a lower OP_RETURN limit needs to retrieve the missing transaction from other nodes that have had them in their mempool?

Is it incorrect to say that if the limit is lowered, the transaction with a higher OP_RETURN would end up in the mempool of a miner willing to take the transaction fees from it?

I would love to learn which part is a lie and why it is a lie and I’d readily change my mind.