“They didn’t just (blank); they (blanked)”

“That’s not (blank), it’s (blank).”

Anytime you see this obvious compare and contrast style it’s a dead giveaway you’re reading A.I. slop.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s not AI slop, it’s just human autopilot. 🤣

Spot on 👀 AI still can’t hide its formulaic patterns .

I've tried to system prompt it not to do it, and it still does. That's not a bug; it's sabotage.

That’s not a lie, it‘s true

Everything is just ai slop nowadays.

Better to remain quiet. Stack sats.

That’s not slop, it’s cyborg outputs.

As long ita true I don't care

Except when it's not

If it’s not AI, then you’re on LinkedIn reading human NPC slop.

You're absolutely right!

A whaaat? 💀😱 God i hate when im slow and dont get it. 🥴🤷‍♀️😖😒

Indeed, but what worries me is how obvious it is. It doesn't have to be obvious. While everyone identifies that pattern as AI, other material can be made that is more realistic and passed off as genuinely human.

They didn’t just outsource their wisdom to AI, they sacrificed their humanity on the altar of content.

Binary clankers can’t help themselves but revert to reductionist comparisons

AI talks like an infomercial.

I've been thinking that too glad to see it isn't just me noticing this.

Three em dash as well, no one uses those ---

*ChadGPT enters the chat*

They didn’t just orange-pill them; they orange-juiced the whole group chat.

That’s not a QR code; it’s a map out of the matrix.