Also, if an article references Keynesianism as relatively egalitarian, they have no clue what outcomes Keynesianism actually produces (hell on Earth through monetary socialism), and that he was a child molester. If the author wants to be genuinely pro human flourishing, they should rethink their entire worldview based on the evidence.
Discussion
Well you seem completely convinced of your own position on the effects of increased CO2 being released into the atmosphere, regardless of empirical evidence. I don’t think it’s worth discussing beyond that.
Ironically, dismissing evidence is why you believe narratives that have injured many people.