ohhh btw here’s the first paper my fren https://www.academia.edu/106315337/The_Gateway_Process_A_23_Day_Personal_Exploration_Using_Brain_Computer_Interface_Technology

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nais

🀌🏻

Happy to help.

#mainvolume

You rang?

I looked at the paper #[5]​ linked, but it doesn’t discuss Cerebral Os. I have other general thoughts about the paper, but I will keep them to myself.

I agree with #[3]#[3]​ that privacy and usage of customer data are major concerns. I’ve always been of the opinion that health tech companies (e.g. 23andMe) should have to abide by the same standards for privacy and data stewardship as hospitals and other healthcare organizations.

If Cerebral Os can truly live up to the hype, then it would be great for disabled individuals. There were a lot groundbreaking claims made in the original post, so I’ll be closely following this account for more info.

Ty nostr:npub1p5z50hjz9hausgfywujml3mpc0haz8df3ah77rkrmssngeg4t3dqxy4yc5 for your response! I was not entirely sure how to respond, but I'll make an effort to follow your lead w/r/t the paper.

You also brought up great point regarding healthcare companies that I hadn't considered. And I think waiting to hear more about what will be announced is another wise choice, so thank you all around πŸ«‚

Hey nostr:npub1p5z50hjz9hausgfywujml3mpc0haz8df3ah77rkrmssngeg4t3dqxy4yc5 I’m interested In hearing your thoughts about the paper. This can help us improve the next paper.

- Milan (Founder)

Hiya

Let’s start by looking fit before going to the beach.

The mission statement is simple enough to make sense.

I dig it, I believe there is potential to help many and entertain some.

#iThink

Then which research white paper comes out of it, looking forward to read.

🎚️

Is there more information or clarification on this project and how it connects to this paper? I'm really curious about this project and paper, but I don't see how they are related. Is there any videos or presentations??

Unfortunately this paper ain't it. For instance, there were no references backing up the claims, there was not enough information about what was being collected (what areas in the brain are they talking about?? How exactly does this tool work? There are many different types of BCI right?). The results section wasn't a results, the figures were links but I couldn't access them. Also this single case study design was done on the author by the author yes? That's not how you do an experiment because, bias.

I really wish that a scientist was hired to help write and explain these ideas because I think it's really interesting!! Doesn't need to be nature worthy. Maybe a video series would have been better to demonstrate the tool and results. If there's ever a re-write or something I'd love to see it it!

nostr:npub1x8x0ayvagveyxs6rntvzwhg2d0g5hhjknsuu0j535qqf535gz3ws5xmdc6

Totally understand your point about the research paper to be honest it was meant to explain Cerebral Os just to address people that may be interested in Focus levels or the Gateway process. We are writing another paper with a lot more information regarding Cerebral.

In regards to the actual study that was posted yes it was done by the author first but we plan on expanding this research with 100 people with different meditation experiences.

I will keep you posted on when the Cerebral OS paper is released which will provide you with all the information you need. Promise this one will be written way better!

- Milan (Founder)