Rabble was unable to censor as he desired, but he was "Community Noting" as a fallback.

He was also using a centralised opaque regime-linked service to do it, and you're not.

But the concept is the same - a (more or less) centralised "source of truth" gets to visibly assert authority over other people's speech.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Except nothing said this system could not be built on a WoT — not a follow based one but actual trust

So, rating our follows for trustworthiness?

That's okay then.

I don't mind, but I also don't see the need. My follows call out BS all the time.

I agree we need to move away from follow based systems, but what can take its place as a metric for trust?