Rabble was unable to censor as he desired, but he was "Community Noting" as a fallback.
He was also using a centralised opaque regime-linked service to do it, and you're not.
But the concept is the same - a (more or less) centralised "source of truth" gets to visibly assert authority over other people's speech.
Except nothing said this system could not be built on a WoT — not a follow based one but actual trust
Please Login to reply.
So, rating our follows for trustworthiness?
That's okay then.
I don't mind, but I also don't see the need. My follows call out BS all the time.
I agree we need to move away from follow based systems, but what can take its place as a metric for trust?
