All you have stated in this thread are negative arguments “countering” my statements.
The problem in structure is that you are proposing a change and have added nothing supporting or outlining any benefits of this change.
Discussion
Your side literally says “fix the filters.”
Not “keep filters the same.”
You are pushing changes as well, hence the push to switch to Knots, where Luke is in solo control.
That is a separate argument. If the original wave of inscriptions were filtered with Luke’s PR we wouldn’t be having this discussion now. Mara caught on to the so called “economic incentive” only a year after the initial wave and passive encouragement.
But perhaps we can use the focus on nodes and software policies for positive changes and a more engaged user-base of Bitcoin.
Skip to end for op_return statement.
Sorry for Twitter link but it works on private browser or make sure you drop the cookies