if there's borderless freedom of speech, the intention of speech would always be up to individual interpretation, therefore being unpunishable to an extent, no?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Everything always is up for interpretation. Ultimately your local court will do the final interpretation.

the moment you start interpreting freedom and get a court involved is when it stops being freedom

Not sure what you mean by this

you are intervening in someone's freedom of speech by a court

therefore it is not free anymore

you are adding an asterisk to it

freedom of speech is a consequenceless ability to speak regardless of tone, intention and words

would you define it differently?

I’m not adding anything. Freedom of speech doesn’t excuse you from the laws your society deemed necessary to prevent certain behavior. But speech alone doesn’t necessitate action unless under context of repeated behavior that is specifically outlawed.