This is unbeatable, read it.
Discussion
WTF! When will this lunatic stop this nonsense
Had this been verified. It seems far-fetched, even for this fucktard.
It is reliable, it comes from bitmex, the case is registered as well.
Thanks. That dude is nuts.
How can his claim be in violation of this?
"Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this
software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software
without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify,
merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so."
this MIT license ensures the original whitepaper. Any deviation from that isn't bitcoin.
You forget that attribution to Satoshi Nakamoto must be given, IDK if you left that part out on purpose?
In other words you can do " use, copy, modify,
merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software" but you can't call it "Bitcoin" without attribution to the author. You can call it something like "Bitcoin Core" or Bitcoin Cash" etc.
I watched a long presentation on this part and the whitepaper itself, and the copyright MIT license, btw this applies to all MIT licenses and is common sense.
Who is bankrolling this moron? No longer CA?
😂😂😂
Does anyone have 911 billion pounds? That's the gross domestic producer of the Netherlands 😂 .
nostr:note1wn2xgch5nejzxrqr0anhpvjyk3qphmrfpl496uj4ghachaluy6kqz4lv4q
oh, well, now that HBO discovered who is Satoshi and that he still is a core contributor, the case is closed! 😅
Wow lol
This reminds me of Frank Rizzo of the Jerky Boys.
"Wtf you talking about pieces. Pounds, baby. Pounds!"
"I thought SegWit and Taproot have always been part of Bitcoin" - said no one ever.
Yet another attack from the same fraud. Don't laugh at the clown. Throw him out of the circus.
a better image quality to read here.
BSV is the original version? lol if that's the case, why did all the exchanges delist the original bitcoin?
It's a rabbit hole, trust me.
why is Craig so passionate about keeping the original protocol vs the new changes since 2017?
what gives? who funds this and why do they fund this?
reading this several times, it seems like he want's "the original protocol" vs post-2017 protocol?
also, notice the UK use's comma's to deliminate notations and a point to define decimals. Thus you can tell this is a case for nine hundred and eleven billion pounds and NOT nine hundred and eleven euros... ahem EU 🙄
If BSV was worth more than BTC he wouldn't be suing.
How many times does this guy need to be proven to be a liar before courts stop taking his cases. 
In case he wins, hypotetically.
Who gonna pay it?
🤔👀
nostr:npub1qv02xpsc3lhxxx5x7xswf88w3u7kykft9ea7t78tz7ywxf7mxs9qrxujnc faketoshi schon wieder .
"without authorization" lol from who does one needs authorization to change a fork on bitcoin
Everyone point and laugh At how retarded this claim is omg
Wow 😮
