The response to this guy is dangerous. The rule of law, and the criminal justice process is they way to afford fair trials, and ensure the impartial administration of justice. What people are essentially supporting is vigilantism, and justice by way of reddit sentimentality. We are, above all else, a nation of laws, and I worry that a trend of declaring guilt or innocence based on the absurd internet popularity contests is eroding our foundational processes. Whether he's guilty or innocent, it's a matter for the courts to determine, not some conspiracy peddling, reddit randos.