nostr:npub1xv8mzscll8vvy5rsdw7dcqtd2j268a6yupr6gzqh86f2ulhy9kkqmclk3x As you guys are leading the way on supporting Schnorr signing outside of the structure of Nostr events, I’d appreciate your thoughts on a “standard” method signature that is future proof which all signers could adopt… if we can convince fiatjaf to include as optional in NIP07/46… or adopt informally if not. As above, it might be better renamed to avoid issues with your established method.

The current iteration is mostly aligned with Alby existing except expects a raw message string.

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1842

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.