We killed nearly all the sperm whales. So their poop is no longer fertilizing the plankton (it was their main source of iron). The end result is there is way less plankton now than 300 years ago.

It is logical to assume that less plankton absorbs less CO2. The health of our oceans is precarious at best, and pretending that we can rely on plankton to clean up our messes is simply wrong.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well, plankton is still the largest consumer. You can research this on your own.

It is safe to produce more food (CO2) for it, it will consume it.

So yes, we can rely on plankton to clean up THAT "mess".

CO2 is not an issue.