Forgot to attach the image:

nostr:nevent1qqs0rpzm8ggccew788zy4wmkg734wll8x0jv3tjer8flau42l8t8hvcp04mhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82c3vwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t093mhxue69uhhyetvv9ukzcnvv5hx7un893mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet593mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mpvwaehxw309ahx7um5wghrq7p4xqh8getrdqmwakty

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#17

#17

( Maybe it's time to implement polls 😬)

#9 #16 #17 (how about boat #9 and wave in #17 housing)

#9 w9th white wave 1st, to separate from boat. Random thought

idk i like 16 i think, the circle w black bg

i think the non boat/moon ones are abstract to the point that the viewer can’t find anything to hold on to. the boat/moon ones have a nice familiarity.

Looking at these reminds me of some interesting logo work I've seen where a brand doesn't settle on one logo but ends up implementing a pattern or algorithm that defines a spectrum of visually cohesive logos where all of them are valid brand marks. Here's an example:

https://www.behance.net/gallery/89197221/Craig-Larson-Landscape-Architects?tracking_source=search_projects|interactive+logo

I think the majority of your options could be condensed into a simple generative algo that makes visually cohesive marks at random. They all look like "you". But they are all unique. Food for thought.

#17

My favorite is #17 clean, different from anything else. 👍