Nostr Web Client

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcsahhd4m

funny that you keep asking questions instead of making direct assertions

let's take "shallow and worthless sex"

how do you know this?

I've done a lot of both I think. I try to make statements when I have something clear and concrete to say.

"Shallow and worthless sex" is not a complete, grammatically correct statement. You would need to add a verb and a subject before I would be able to say what I know and how. For example, I could tell you why I believe that "gay sex with boys is shallow and worthless sex", but I wouldn't be able to tell you why "shallow and worthless sex."

If that's what you were trying to ask, then I could answer it easily. I know that sex is shallow and worthless when it's between two males, because two males have nothing to offer eachother that the other doesn't already have without sex. I know that sex between an adult and a little boy is shallow and worthless because children are too incompetent and infertile for an adult parner and because adults are too ugly and unattractive for an underaged partner.

I hope these assertions are direct enough for you, I don't want to be passive aggressive when there is an opportunity to be actively critical towards you or your beliefs.

I would love to hear more questions from you. If you have any thing else you want to talk about, please try to make more complete sentences. It's easier to respond to what you have to say if you are more explicit about what exactly you are asking.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

relentless_eduardo 7mo ago

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq4pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcsahhd4m

the conclusion of your first paragraph contradicts your first statement. let's not play games with grammar here.

secondly if you can say something is x then of course you would be able to explain why. It's a logical necessity.

Scoundrel 7mo ago

Please actually type out what you refer to as "the conclusion of my first paragraph" and what you refer to as my "first statement". As it is, you are making it unnecessarily difficult to determine whether you have actually read anything I've written.

Earlier you asked me to explain how I know "shallow and worthless sex". Now you seem unsurprised that I "would be able to explain why." Have I addressed your question about shallow and worthless sex?

Also, to address your other comment about my usage of the word grooming, I agree. The idea that talking to someone could ever take away someone's free will or make a person solely responsible for the other's actions is completely bunk, whether it gets called grooming, brainwash, or the devil's whisper.

The reality is that any kind of communication requires engagement from both sides. Plenty of boys would realize how fucked up sex with a man is all on their own, and would require brutality in order for the man to be able to have sex with them. A man can't groom a boy into making a mistake unless the boy's naivety aligns with the man's message and unless the boy uses that message to come to his own false conclusions.

Really when a boy and a man have sex, the sex is bad all on its own. There's nothing inherently wrong with grooming and there doesn't need to be any brutality for the sex to be bad.