Encroachment of someone's else's property like expansion of israeli occupation of Palestine?
Israel's war in Gaza is not a valid act of self-defence. Hamas is not a terrorist organization but an organization acting according to their right to self-defence. How do you like this approach? If we are painting pictures that befit established agendas, we can easily paint it black or white
My ethics are simple. Taking hostages, killing hostages is not worthy of warriors. A boy does not grow up when his scrotum grows hair. A boy becomes a man when he does not hide behind unarmed people. When he fights armed warriors, not unarmed women and children. When he does not beg for approval, citing the actions of the enemy, as children do. For a man, the task is not to win by any means necessary, but to ensure that his weapons are not stained with the blood of unarmed people.
I wonder how the territorial expansion was done. Must have been some class worriors fighting them. Nothing covert, no shady schemes, just pure chivalrous Jewish soldiers. The last part even reads funny.
A child seeks justification for his meanness in the actions of his opponent. An adult man does not stoop to meanness, even if he is granted an indulgence from Mecca.
A man does not shoot children for fun.
Such an honorable manly thing to do
People are mad trying to defend these atrocities. Please atop your narrative, you ain't changing anyone opinion on this. It's plain to see who's the evil terrorist here.
