It is not hard to tell. On Twitter, if you criticized him you’d be met by a lil army of shills. Don.t like that r/BTC sub on Reddit either and how the sub description was changed. But Ver found Nostr I guess, seeing BCH shills popping up here and there lately.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I am not a BCH shill. I think large blocks on L1 are a bad idea, but this does not mean large blocks do not have a use case.

The problem with big L1 blocks is it makes the cost to run an L1 node too expensive. If less people can run a full node, then the 21 million could be compromised. The 21 million is all that matters.

With a big block sidechain, pegged 1:1 by Bitcoin’s proof of work, it doesn’t matter if the optional L2 node is a bit more expensive. We can have multiple big block sidechains with atomic swaps; so the 21 million is always secured, and the sidechains are still FAR more decentralized than any shitcoin or custodial lightning.

I was not referring to you. Just random notes I spotted here and there. I’m not really criticizing big blocks, I’m criticizing people using shady tactics. (I don’t understand blockchains well enough to have an opinion on block size, but I understand human behavior well enough I guess)

After reading that interview with nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 I am indeed curious about sidechains.