im all for women doing what comes natural to them including haggling in the marketplace. we all would rather buy from a woman vs a man as they are more pleasant and they tend to be more catering.
but to yout point, i think we are 4-5 generations into this brainwashing at this point in america. its officially whore of babylon territory. 🤣🤣🤣
Humans see what they want to ... through rose colored glasses or second-hand ones they wore educating theirselves.
I think most men prefer feminism because it makes women more physically (and eventually, if he plays his cards right and the situation allows for it, sexually) available.
The only man who benefits from a woman being a bit hidden is the man (or men, on a more tribal level) who gets to control access to her, and he only gains that ability by having his access to other women likewise restricted.
How many men have access to a woman so valuable that they'd be willing to sacrifice their access to other women, in order to guard her?
How many men have access to a woman so valuable that they'd be willing to sacrifice their access to other women, in order to guard her?
can you rephrase?
If women are not direct public actors (as before feminism, where their male head-of-house often had to open bank accounts for them, agree to their contracts, manage their property, agree to marriage proposals of their female dependents, vote on their behalf, etc.) then it means that men are interacting primarily with other men, rather than directly with women.
How many men would give up the ability to interact with all women, in order to limit the men who can interact with "their" women? Not many, I think.
I think it's something limited to men who themselves belong to some exotic fringe, such as fundamentalist religious groups, because "their" women are so tailor-made to their own preferences (and therefore valuable because so "well-fitting") that other women don't really interest them much.
You're speaking in smart again. Please talk retard so i can understands.
TL;DR
Anti-feminist women are just women who are willing to stand behind some men because those men are persuing some aim those women value higher than their own independence.
And you can't see those women because they're hidden by the men they're standing behind.
Ah, modesty.
I love modesty.
❤️
I think it's more "meekness" or "humility", than "modesty". 🤔
There is a movie about a mexican astronaut. The movie is kind of boring, it's directed and written by women. So it's a low testosterone movie, be advised.
Still very nice and very interesting to see how a supportive wife can turn a man into a hero.
I suppose that it's the concept of sex-specialization.
Are a man and a woman working side-by-side, splitting each task precisely 50/50 the most efficient?
Or is it more efficient to divvy up the tasks by sex, at least in part?
Well, that would depend upon whether you think men and women are identical or different.
She ended up opening a restaurant and he ended up becoming an astronaut at NASA.
Had 5 kids or more.
All thanks to a supportive wife. And I believe it's true. It's a true story, btw.
I own no woman, I own only myself. Women have had to trick men into staying around to provide for their kids. Menstruation in disguise requires an always present male as you will never know if the offspring are yours otherwise.
In a egalitarian society we are able to remove the threat of violence, we have given that monopoly to the state in hopes we can produce more
I trust my wife, and she must trust in me.
Yes, our society directs that monopoly toward enforcing (and financing) egalitarianism as raison d'État.
i think of chess. i wont push my queen to the front line for nothing but i will use her to strike as she has the most poweeful in my arsenal. i remember when kanye sent his woman (kim) at the time to the white house to execute a mission via the trumpstr classic chess move. in the end he lost her but the creator didnt stop making women when he made her. 🙂
Under feminism you have no queen because you are not a king. You could, at most, be two kings or two queens acting according to some agreed-upon plan.
im aware i make her queen when i fatten her as she is just a princess (my power) until then. but you are correct, she can unilateral fuck me over if her feelings switch. under feminism there is little i can do as the law (her other man) supports her betrayal as opposed to stoning her for her treachery/witchcraft. good thing gentlemen had a greater impact on me and taught me, relations is by choice not by force. btw every woman talking feminism loved when i dominated her 😁😁😁
you should start some video content here and invite feminist to discuss.
As if feminists don't already dominate all platforms, everywhere, including Nostr. 😏
This is actually the sort of thing that would result in my Twitter account getting frozen for wrong-think.
Quick, someone call the Nostr CEO and get that note taken down! 😱
