never believe that a billionaire is your friend. they are only a friend of themselves and they do not pursue your interests. maybe jack is a rare exception but i doubt it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That statement speaks more about you than anything else.

explain that

No

because you can't .

Surest sign you are in the right is when your interlocutor refuses to even state his case.

it is a cult.

i love the monero community

smart people

they argue with facts

"MY cult is better!"

what is your cult

oh i see what you meant. agreed

I don't fault Presin for not responding to you. Opinions like this are often times more of a reflection of yourself than reality.

Being a billionaire doesn't inherently make someone evil. To start from the base assumption that a human is evil of they have wealth speaks more to the relationship that person has with money than it does the person being criticized.

Hope you can see the world just a little bit more positivity and succeed in whatever personal struggles you are going through 🫂

how do you know how i see the world? explain that assumption

i mean tell me any personal struggles i am going through. please tell me. i want to know about those

Yeah it says he's smart.

So what your saying is all billionaires are abs and after their own agenda. Seems a bit prejudice. But hey you do you.

of course they are. do you know how they made their money? do you know how the fiat economy works? look at the reality what most of them do with their money. prove me wrong

So you assume things about a person because their personal wealth is orders of magnitude more than your own. If that's a good general rule, then anyone in a second or third world country should assume any person in the West is awful and has no morals.

This is the occupy movement mentality, which was deeply flawed IMO. It's not rich vs poor, it's those seeking to coerce vs those seeking to liberate.

with regards to this guy, according to this actions in the last 10 years: he was 'tweeting' for many years, had subpoenas in front of congress, spoke about twitter and other things, there is enough material in order to judge him in a fair way. i do not buy that he suddenly endorses free speech. what you write does not make any sense. you assume and accuse.

Only actions can be judged.

google slave-morality