Discussion
If you can't back up your own arguments, why make them in the first place? Disappointed tbh.
My argument is simple: there's no such thing as KYC or non-KYC bitcoin. Is simply bitcoin all the way, anywhere, there's no different bitcoin the one you bought on a KYC exchange or you got it from a friend.
If that difference will exist it means we have two bitcoin. But that is total bullshit.
Well at the network layer, obviously. I don't think anyone thinks I'm suggesting otherwise. But you cannot run away from the fact that, depending on how you buy Bitcoin, externalities are applied to those coins.
You're free to run around saying these externalities don't exist or that you don't recognize them, but it doesn't change reality.
OK we agree to disagree here.
We have to be careful what kind of titles and terms we put in the articles, because total noobs will read them and will think that the term "tainted coins" or "KYC-coins" really exist.
I am not saying that KYC procedures are good and we should ignore them. Not at all. I will always recommend to avoid as much is possible using any type of KYC, not only for acquiring BTC.
KYC is a disease that could ruin your life if it gets in the wrong hands.
Again, gov already knows about your BTC, that is not the real problem. The real problem is when your KYC data gets into wrong hands (and is just a matter of time until it gets).
I bet you dont have a license plate on your car nostr:npub1lxktpvp5cnq3wl5ctu2x88e30mc0ahh8v47qvzc5dmneqqjrzlkqpm5xlc