What hardware are you running umbrel on?
From my understanding, android profiles is enough separation. Avoids the two phones for this particular purpose.
This is the same on graphene.
You wont get ur banking apps working without google services, and I believe this bug is through google services.
I have an isolated google profile on graphene where I run google services for government and banking apps and it gave me this warning.
Lets chat. DM me your signal username.
The x is silent right? I want to be a rabid bitcoin maix also, can I be a rabid bitcoin maix?
I HELD ON FOR SEVEN EPISODES
This is a fucking shit show, holy shit, how bad advice can you give.
Namecheap dont do lightning do they???
Thats actually a damn cool idea I think.
Yo man 🙏 we're in the same boat 🫂 data guy here also.
If you develop an open source calculator and make "software changes" that carefully consider edge cases, sure.
When talking about the future of money, i think throwing that in under trivial "software changes" depicts your disrespect for the project you're influencing changes on.
Its simply too risky to implement changes, so we avoid it unless the benefits are extremely obvious and the risks have been studied deeply.
And I am by no means deeply into the weeds of the op_return issue.
I do however understand that we need to be EXTREMELY careful when making changes to a bitcoin implementation that is so widely used -- AND I also understand that supporting bitcoin core changes to help "extreme edge cases", given the above point of extreme care, just doesn't compute.
So, based on your own words in video above - I disagree with you, in that it lives up to your responsibility as whatever person in bitcoin you are (of higher than average importance) to support such a change.
Remember! My disagreement here is based 👏 on 👏 your 👏 own 👏 words 👏 PLUS the idea that changes to bitcoin core should be taken with EXTREME CARE.
I actually thought Lopp was a core contributor. I disagree that being mistaken on that voids my point in this thread.
Go flash your rights somewhere else, whats within your rights isn't always whats the right thing to do.
Again cheap answers. Well, "answers".
It's a yes or no question, but avoidance is what's keeping your own sanity alive.
Don't answer me, i have zero expectations. Answer yourself though!!
Does it live up to your responsibility to advocate for a change in bitcoin core that serves - in your own damn words - an extreme edge case?
Cheap again. Picking out the easy notes to reply to. You're not obligated to reply. But if you're going to, try replying to the matter at hand. Not that I have high expectations.
We can try here if the matter at hand isn't clear for you.
Does it live up to your responsibility as a core developer to advocate for - and push through - a highly controversial change to bitcoin core, if the usecase for that change is an extreme edge case?
Wtf makes you guys think that choosing core = choosing lopp or choosing knots = choosing luke??
We're choosing code, not maintainers. Obviously. If that wasn't the case, NO ONE, other than a few retodds would run core.
What boggles my mind mostly with this op_return change is that the core devs think the right move is to go ahead with it when there is clearly a divided opinion about it.
Since it doesnt DEFINITELY save bitcoin it should NOT be implemented if it is the cause of a large scale debate like this. No change is better than controversial change. OR at least compromises should be made, like what happend during the blocksize wars.
This luke quote is ABSOLUTELY THE LEAST IMPORTANT ARGUMENT IN THIS DEBATE.
Is it indicative of a person that apparently values fiat laws over human rights, yes absolutely, and thats not great at all, but its not an argument in the op_return debate. Its a valid argument in the "is luke a white privileged dickhead" debate.
Nah man. Its know-str because you dont say "NOTS" instead of "notes"
But its also Nostr because Other has the O u mention.
How about for laptops, whats your go-to solution there?
My explanation is, that its really the most prosperous free country on earth and they just want to keep it for themselves, so they created a narrative that its horrible and suppressive and closed.
Then suddenly the filters appear before our eyes and we realize its really the opposite. We, in the west, have been living under suppressive regimes, we're the slaves and the zombies but all this time we we're manipulated to think it was them!!
Im writing this dystopian book one day. Think I might call it....... Mandibles 2.
Seems like they're really feeling the need to say that out loud a lot. One might think they're trying to convince themselves more than convince us 👀