Science is never neutral, and just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. Some of the things they discuss are extremely powerful--too powerful--and, to embarrass myself by quoting Marvel's "Winter Solder" movie -- "no one should have that much power." The power to "control human genetics" and our food?
No.
HARD no.
I agree with you on some points. But we are browsing internet and using mobile phone processors and using blockchain because of Nanotechnology (processing). Biotech is important for medicines and building new vaccines as we did in remarkable amount of time in pandemic. IT (Infotech) is all we are building our Web3 apps on, backend and networking structure, our nostr relays etc. Similarly, Cognitive Science is important too for understanding of human cognition (not to control), consciousness, to treat diseases like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and disorders like depression etc.
Please correct me if I am mistaken. It's a double edged sword though, I agree.
If the document I posted is read in concert with others like the PNAC's "Project for a New American Century" or the publications of the Tri-Lateral Commission or the Rockefeller Foundation or the WEF or UN or IMF or WHO etc. it is clear that underlying them all is the same agenda--and that agenda is anti-individual, anti-civil-liberties, even (at bottom) anti-Christian. That's all I'm saying. I don't have time to say more.
Ugh. I meant PNAC's "rebuilding America's defenses" from 2020
