Replying to Avatar paulo

Why?

He's promoting the deletion of OP_RETURN.

He's even doing it in a dishonest way by posting Greg's reddit post as though he isn't on the same team.

He should just own it and say he wants to profit from spam.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I sincerely find it hard to believe you’re talking about Lopp.

This whole thing is a non-issue, but what do I know.

I don’t know ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It sounds like making rational agreements is not in her wheelhouse.

If it’s a non-issue, why not leave it alone? Your argument is an oxymoron. There’s something rotten in the state of Denmark (Bitcoin Core). And while not ideal, I’m running Knots.

I don’t see why it’s an oxymoron. But no need to respond. I’m good.

If „the whole thing is a non-issue“ why is there the urge to change the OP_RETURN limit and thus cause so much collateral damage to the trust in Bitcoin Core?

I feel no urge to do anything other than buying more bitcoin, my friend.