Replying to nobody

I don’t understand how to get it through thick skulls: *any* form of centralized moderation is anathema to free speech. *Any* form of content curation that is opt out instead of opt in is anathema to free speech.

And yes, I am perfectly happy to turn child diddlers over to the state. That is the proper and correct role of the state. I’m not an anarchist.

If you cannot handle curating your own feed then free speech is not for you. Freedom comes with the responsibility to not be a little sensitive bitch and block what you don’t like, report what should be prosecuted, and move the fuck on.
Avatar
a_priori 2y ago

I'm am an anarchist and I'm all for chopping the child diddlers up.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
My Hot Friend 2y ago

This! Anarchists follow the non-aggression principle. Assaulting children violates that, and protecting others from harm is not something frowned upon 😘

72
nobody 2y ago

I’ll never defend those who violate the rights of others. But I do believe in just laws and their enforcement. I’m the days of the wild frontier a father would just shoot the guy, and that’s probably ok. But we have a process now, and I believe we should follow that process, until society agrees to change or abolish it.

Those changes or abolition are matters of policy, and outside the scope of the discussion imo. But I certainly support punishment for those who harm the innocent.

Avatar
My Hot Friend 2y ago

We probably agree more than we disagree on that 😉

72
nobody 2y ago

That is probably true for 90% of the arguments on the internet, and I appreciate the good faith conversation.

Avatar
My Hot Friend 2y ago

😘