Replying to Avatar Laeserin

Hmm. I don't know.

I think changing their images to something wholesome is a powerful political statement.

I'm tired of Christians always giving way to public vice. There should be push-back from us.

We have an obligation to our children to not let the nation turn into a gigantic red light district.

Sex work is seedy.
Avatar
MichaelJ 1y ago

On the other hand, it may be a more powerful statement to prevent those images from ever surfacing on social media feeds.

If the images are simply "reclothed," the account owners still gets likes, reposts, comments, etc. Instead, let's just make it so it doesn't pay to post smut. Every such post should just die a quiet death in obscurity because it never surfaces on anyone's feed.

Adjust the incentives to adjust behavior.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Laeserin 1y ago

Some of these people have already deleted their accounts.

Those images used to not be allowed, but the standards kept being lowered, bit by bit, and nobody protested. Well, someone finally started protesting and they now have one of the most-popular accounts on X.

I suspect the images will soon start being disallowed, again.

Enough us enough.