So hard to tell but isn't she turning the car towards the guy who shot her?
I'm not sure what the legal situation is for blocking traffic on a public street and if those specific people have the jurisdiction to arrest her.
But I think assault with a deadly weapon is how they could argue it.
The rulers will find any argument to use excessive force. Any disobedience or protests from the people will be crushed with brute force. Any law they invent will incorporate the idea that the public is a threat to the rulers. Not, the opposite as all constitution's has warned us about.
Even if they invented a law tomorrow that allowed them self the kill all women between 40-50. It's does not have any legitimacy from a foundational/constitutional stance, where the people have to be protected from government overreach.
Yes I agree people will use power and legality is just a formality.
What I keep wresting with is kinda related to your idea on protecting people. How do people believe that it's all corrupt and then protest. then are surprised by a violent outcome?
Shouldn't you be completely non kinetic if you're hoping social norms and laws will protect you. I think people used to go limp when arrested.
Or have enough force and power to overtake the existing system
Everything else seems like you're just poking the bear
