A reporter emailed at 5 pm on Friday requesting a comment for their article. They gave 3 hours to respond before publishing.
I honestly don't know why you'd even bother reaching out unless you wanted to be able to disingenuously print "he didn't respond when asked for comment."
Wow that is such bad faith π€¦ββοΈ
Lol
shady and duplicitous
I've heard of them doing this so many times. It seems like they just want to write the article without doing any work to talk to people
laziness is a plague in a society of narcissists
you should have said βhmm β¦ interesting. Iβll have to think more about that.β
Poor practice. But just curious what is a reasonable minimum amount of time?
At least 24 hours in my opinion. Certainly not 3 hours on a Friday.
And that's just for a chance to respond/setup a different time to discuss it. Of course, this my answers are from my own perspective and what I would consider ethical in that position. Not everyone shares my ethics in that field. Most are scumbags now, in my opinion.
I've seen others fall prey to this scumbag tactic.
hmm so is that what they wrote?
They do all the time in smear articles
If your life depends on me responding to an email within three hours, I hope you're right with Jesus Christ. π€£
nostr:note1020ft5lycvn78dl8vmzc06d6395wkdxslrzhk9uz2r42y7srks3qcymsd5
