Setting aside causality (acetaminophen or underlying condition) this is a bad take and a false binary.
Discussion
Tell that to the woman that are being told to "toughen up" and risking the life of their babies together while experiencing a 4 week long headache and fever (which is where the association with autism starts).
First, I'm not in the "no Tylenol" crowd. Second, even if I was, why not tackle the fever by addressing the underlying cause (e.g, urinary tract infection w/antibiotics) rather than simply suppressing with acetaminophen or a NSAID? Also, hydration is seriously underrated in fever suppression. My point is that there are other options. Hence, charging the "no Tylenol" crowd with "defending abortion" is a false binary.
The other options have risks too. Not doing anything also has risks. Nothing can be discarded as an option because it can very well be the best option. None of this is new. The only new thing is government claiming causality without any data to back it off.
Guy, no one said toughen up. This has been known for at least 4 years because they told my wife not to take tylenol when she was carrying my first son. They have alternatives, Tylenol is just very common so they have to actively tell women to avoid it.
I feel like we are making things partisan that weren't before because a specific person said it. If Trump said Nostr was the best thing and more people should develop it, would you stop your work?