Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar kidwarp

"This $0 tax stamp compromise has created a legal vulnerability for the NFA.

There is only one example for a federal tax being set to $0—the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate.

In NFIB v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court upheld the mandate as a tax. But when Congress later reduced that tax to $0, the court ruled that the mandate could no longer be justified under Congress’s taxing power and was therefore unconstitutional.

That same legal logic applies here. If there’s no longer a revenue-generating tax, can the suppressor registry and approval process under the NFA still stand? No."

https://www.silencershop.com/blog/hearing-protection-act-2025

nostr:note1wlr8ruhvdsxnequcv4x4dv6ugjptyfg5f390cjdtvcphzdt7d06qr8pjqk

69
Austin 6mo ago

I hate relying on the courts.

I do plan to file one thousand nine hundred thirty four (1934) form 1s. Following the law to show them how stupid it is.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
kidwarp 6mo ago

Yeah I agree hope they do the right thing…

Thread collapsed