"This $0 tax stamp compromise has created a legal vulnerability for the NFA.

There is only one example for a federal tax being set to $0—the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate.

In NFIB v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court upheld the mandate as a tax. But when Congress later reduced that tax to $0, the court ruled that the mandate could no longer be justified under Congress’s taxing power and was therefore unconstitutional.

That same legal logic applies here. If there’s no longer a revenue-generating tax, can the suppressor registry and approval process under the NFA still stand? No."

https://www.silencershop.com/blog/hearing-protection-act-2025

nostr:note1wlr8ruhvdsxnequcv4x4dv6ugjptyfg5f390cjdtvcphzdt7d06qr8pjqk

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is the signal

Not reposting other notes

Give me that alpha 👌

#haiku

I hate relying on the courts.

I do plan to file one thousand nine hundred thirty four (1934) form 1s. Following the law to show them how stupid it is.

Yeah I agree hope they do the right thing…