It’s sort of a “car vs faster horse” thing. If you ask people on twitter what they want, they’ll say “less bots”. What if they just want to know when they’re talking to a real human for certain, and a way to optionally filter out all bots in general?
Doesn’t need to become a desperate marketing ploy for Nostr, but it could absolutely be a leg up for the network if a solution like that existed here. Because twitter will always promote spam bots. They increase shareholder value.
I wonder though if something like Bright ID could be implemented in a frictionless manner with a Nostr app though. Linking Nostr ID to Bright ID is simple enough. From there it’s essentially just scanning a QR code in person to verify your friends. Sybil resistance and privacy preserving afaik
I'd personally like to see a NIP for this; ID providers could then publish attestations (unless privacy is an issue?) and clients could fetch attestations from reputed ID providers. This would make it possible for anyone to become an ID provider.
Yeah the main question is how to preserve privacy. Seemingly the best way is to just have multiple verifier services.
But the thing is, their ability to truly identify a human accurately would still be inferior to a full Sybil resistant network right? People could share fake credentials and scam the verifiers. I guess multiple verifiers would compete on who could verify the best, but still. The meta game could incentivize the verifiers to allow a few exceptions here and there.
A decentralized solution like the two I linked above (maybe there are others too) might be better
All those Nostr meetups and conferences, people could be scanning each others phones and verifying each other!
That's sort of what I'm thinking, if anyone can make attestations you can select which ones you trust, making it decentralized and also be able to fallback to well-known/institutional ones. You don't have to limit yourself to just one attestation either.
What if someone is verified human and then lets a bot run their account? They can go to a different verifier and prove to be human again. They can have as many bots as there are verifier services.
I think this is the problem that Bright ID tries to solve
Interesting, I see what you mean. I'll have to look more closely at it
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Bring back GPG key signing parties.
“It was just a UX problem?”
“Always has been”
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed