Well 99.9% of TX adhere to the filter policies. You mix up censorship resistance with rate limiting spam. Nobody complains if there are a couple of non-standard tx finding their way in the blockchain, if someone really wants that, but its something different to open the flood gates and helping proliferate it ,without any reason or benefit to node runners.
Discussion
You can continue with your node as is but that will not prevent it from spreading, so miners do need to be well connected and be able to have all the tx at hand, the lack of coordination only favors the large miners. Ultimately, the merged PR of op_return is for better connectivity, the doors were never closed, with one command you could expand the data carrier without any problem.
If you analyse non-standard tx on the blockchain you will see that filters work as intended., in the sense that most TX mined adhere to it. Exactly what the filters where defiend for in the first place. Miners who mine non-standard tx will be punished by slower block propagation through the open relay network. This risks orphaned blocks and thats why it disincentivises them to mine spam. Economic nodes will enforce this upon the miners and the network and limit the amount of those TX mined effectivly, as emperical proof can be found on thee bitcoin blockchain.
That's not what would be happening sir. The big miners have open limits to have better connectivity, the small ones don't. It's fine as long as you defend your position, but go and check the timechain to see what you find, at least deny the reality of what's happening.
Well it's public knowledge that most tx adhere to the current OP_RETURN limits. What is your point?
Miner Centralisation is a big problem, but unrelated to this discussion and cannot be solved by bowing down to malicious actors.
If you don't understand how the lack of connectivity due to having limits on your node as a miner can centralize mining and you have to send me someone else's opinion, you are simply retarded.
Nodes >> Miners , always has been. Grow some morals, instead of bowing down and cough, for the party with the weakest and most short term incentives. My point is still valid and based on historical data.