yes, but you obviously haven't tried entrepreneurship because if that loan costs you more than the collateral asset could have been sold for then you are still in arrears on your cashflow.
Discussion
Selling assets incurs additional costs as well as relinquishing ownership. Quite often those factors make the decision to take a loan out an easy one vs selling.
HFSP tho, if you lend it when you would profit more by spending it as you need to during a bull run
especially right now, lending bitcoin for capex is a dumb idea, better plan is to phase your expenditure as much as you can, defer it because your passive gains are going to be better if you don't.
economy right now is in chaos because of the new regime in washington and it's affecting the global market all over the place. i'm cheering for efforts to disrupt things to reduce the asymmetries but right now my main concern is doing my job well and ensuring that my work doesn't get wasted on bad decisions about subjects i'm something of an expert in (eg, spam, social networks, network security in general, cryptography).
so, i'm just gonna say, all these companies racing to offer bitcoin loans are clearly seeing an opportunity to profit at the expense of enterprises, because it makes no sense to spend an asset that is growing proportionally to your holdings, versus other times when the growth is sub-inflation.
Your not lending any bitcoin. Your premise is totally false. You’re getting a loan using bitcoin as collateral. How can anyone take you seriously if your fundamental premise misunderstands the product?
The taxes part is what makes it make sense.