I’m anti censorship.

Get it?

If you want censorship get the fuck off Nostr & go back to x, fb & wtf else ever corporately controlled "social media" platforms that already exist.

I personally do not care if nostr "fails" because it never catches on & goes mainstream…. Kinda sounds like bitcoin dying for the millionth time right?

It’s already won because it’s a protocol & not a platform owned my a greedy conglomerate.

I’m not trying to sound like an asshole or anything but nostr is an un-censurable protocol layer stop trying to censor the users & let them make their own choices.

Most people are just to used to being lied to about what’s on the fucking internet & it’s time for that shit to stop.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don’t want to disappoint you with reality but nostr hasn’t won yet. And there are a lot of protocols created during last decades, many even more censorship-resistant, did they also win? If I create the same protocol as nostr but with all keywords capitalized or in spanish does it also win by default?

The problem with what you call censorship is complex because everyone views it in their personal way :) which is kinda incompatible with “global discourse”

And you also want moderation. Now you call it “mute and paid relays” and looking forward for “client algos” then you will call it “topical relays” or similar

There also will be people who will kinda get as close to “no moderation” as possible - by using only private/family relays (which is a moderation by social graph property under the hood)

So, moderation will always take place in something bigger than monologue. The question is how to take control over this moderation so it would match your needs as much as YOU want as possible instead of the platforms CEO AND keep room for global-or-similar discourse