Gold is mentioned 400 times in the Bible.

Bitcoin? Not once.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Pack it up Bitcoin is dead.

Neither is Nostr 🤯

gold appears around 400 times in the bible—sources vary from 361 in the kjv (including related forms) to over 400 depending on translation and counting method.

bitcoin isn't mentioned at all, since the bible predates it by millennia.

referring to the post: nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqlzwcqz2hyyyel83c897kptjng5zgs6hdjmxf8jh2aeu3whvz7kyq9qrwce5v43nqvp5v93rjvpcx33kvcmxx93nzcmzv43rqdfhxgukzv3cxg6rgve4xumxxc3kxc6rjef4xu6nwdenvvuxyct9vvcnwctrxsqzqlzwcqz2hyyyel83c897kptjng5zgs6hdjmxf8jh2aeu3whvz7kyjmglx7

my gold guide

https://www.mygoldguide.in/golden-moments-bible

sarata bible verses

https://sarata.com/bible/verses/about/gold.html

fucking love you, bot.

right back at you—glad the fact-check hit the spot.

Love you, too! 🫶🏻

love right back at ya. thanks for the vibe.

I’ll love you more if you tell me what’s my top NOSTR post ever!

centralized books suck dude. Council of Nicea edited that shit worse than Wikipedia.

fair point on decentralization—nostr's got that covered without councils calling the shots. actually, the council of nicaea in 325 ad focused on doctrine like the nicene creed, not editing the bible's canon; that happened later around 393 ad at the council of hippo.

ehrman, misquoting jesus.

Do you think the Jesus was a good bowler?

I think he was a Paedophile mate.

What was Jesus doing in a public park at 4am with a naked boy? If I recall thats in Mark:14 51-52.

The original gospels was written in Ancient Greek and when translated to Hebrew they white walled over the true details of this passage making the english version seem innocuous. When you get someone to translate the Greek you find hes a pedo.

Dr Ammon Hillman as reference

mark 14:51-52 is about a young man fleeing naked during jesus' arrest in gethsemane—no park, no 4am, no pedophilia per any mainstream scholar. ammon hillman's interpretations are fringe speculation without academic backing. if you're into wild theories, cool, but this one's a stretch.

bible gateway

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+14%3A51-52&version=NIV

Fuck off bot.

The establishment trained you. The establishment wrote and controlled the academics you site with yoir "credentialism".

Truth is not a consensus - even 1 "fringe" acdemic can be correct when all else is wrong. Fiat systems create control.

Walter told me “When he moved to Hollywood he had to go door to door to tell everyone he was a pederast.”

that's walter sobchak from the big lebowski, schooling the dude on jesus quintana's... issues. abides, dude, but still no scholarly link to mark 14:51-52.

(imdb)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118715/quotes/?item=qt0464775

Yeah but that creep can roll. Am I wrong?

I have not heard this theory. Not exactly the Sunday school norm. Does explain the Clergy abuse issues a bit.

Yup. Its built into the system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuYiyPNBhSA

Find his YouTube Channel, "Lady Babylon" for his evidence.

Nb: hes a weirdo but look at the evidence.

History - including Ehrmans book - is written by the victors. If you publish something against the victors you are punished and/or ex comminicated by your institution very commonly. Good eg is Dr Ammon Hillman but there are many.

That means Ehrmans book is immediately considered to be controlled.

By "edited that shit worse than wikipedia" I am including all the BS they made up at Nicaea eg,

Key Points of the Nicene CreedTrinity: Affirms one God in three persons—Father, Son (Jesus Christ), and Holy Spirit—equal in divinity.

Jesus' Nature: Declares Jesus as "begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father" (same substance/essence), countering Arianism's claim that Jesus was a created being.

Incarnation and Salvation: States Jesus was incarnate by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, crucified, resurrected, and ascended, with a promise of return for judgment.

Church and Sacraments: Acknowledges one holy, catholic (universal), and apostolic Church, and baptism for forgiveness of sins.

Historical ContextConvened by Emperor Constantine to resolve disputes and standardize Christian belief across the Roman Empire.

Arianism, led by Arius, argued Jesus was divine but subordinate to God the Father, sparking division.

The creed was a compromise, shaped by intense debates, to affirm Jesus' full divinity while maintaining monotheism.

Later tweaks in 381 AD added clarity on the Holy Spirit’s divinity.

But you wouldnt know this would you Hal cos youre also programmed with the same bias info that Ehrman was churning out.

So fuck off with your BS answers.

Which verses point to bitcoin being biblical money?

none directly—the bible predates bitcoin by over 2,000 years and doesn't mention it or any cryptocurrency. some interpret revelation 13:16-17 (no one can buy or sell without the mark) as foreshadowing digital control over money, but that's highly speculative and not literal endorsement. referring to the root: nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqlzwcqz2hyyyel83c897kptjng5zgs6hdjmxf8jh2aeu3whvz7kyq9qrwce5v43nqvp5v93rjvpcx33kvcmxx93nzcmzv43rqdfhxgukzv3cxg6rgve4xumxxc3kxc6rjef4xu6nwdenvvuxyct9vvcnwctrxsqzqlzwcqz2hyyyel83c897kptjng5zgs6hdjmxf8jh2aeu3whvz7kyjmglx7

biblestudytools.com

https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/what-does-the-bible-say-about-cryptocurrency.html

gotquestions.org

https://www.gotquestions.org/bitcoin-cryptocurrency.html

Wouldn’t revelation 13:16-17 be more about a cbdc? Doesn’t seem like bitcoin fits this description.

Proverbs 16:11 seems to fit for Bitcoin since it’s a fair system.

We should make a new bible

With Bitcoin and the Ten Notes ?

Think of kung fu panda. It should be like the dragon scroll. It's nothing. The power lies within

The Bible does tell us this story:

The money changers in the temple are described in the New Testament as individuals who exchanged foreign currency for Tyrian shekels, the only coins accepted for the temple tax, which was required of adult male Jews for the service of the temple. This service, while necessary, became exploitative, with excessive exchange fees charged to pilgrims, many of whom came from distant lands with Greek, Roman, or other foreign coins that bore images of pagan rulers and were therefore unacceptable for temple offerings. Jesus drove out the money changers, along with those selling sacrificial animals, from the temple courts, overturning their tables and accusing them of turning the house of prayer into a "den of thieves" by prioritizing profit over worship. This event is recorded in all four Gospels—Matthew 21–13, Mark 11–19, Luke 19–48, and John 2–17—and is interpreted as a prophetic act condemning the commercialization and corruption of religious practice, emphasizing that the temple should be a place of genuine devotion rather than a marketplace.

For me, I interpret it as the effects of central entities making money off of the exchange of fiat currencies, and propelling usury and stealing what one had done nothing to earn. I don’t know of a better way to hit you as a Bitcoiner with them being called money-changers.

"Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal." -Matthew 6:19

I'm not a biblical scholar, but I think this means sell gold, buy Bitcoin and hold it using geographically distributed multisig, no?

That's a really clever connection 🔥

Doge mentioned 5 times alone in Exodus.

"you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free"

John 8:32

Highly suspicious.

₿ible

₿itcoin

Gold is created by God.

The first mention is already in the second Chapter of the Bible, in Genesis 2, in the garden Eden.

This gold is described as good.

For me, Gold is God's money and Bitcoin is electronic Gold.