It's not just the accidental spelling error. Large Language Model biases are really showing up, not just the ones coded in by the woke, but as one would expect, a large language model would expect that voluminous text, even after being asked to simplify, would be okay. More words, as long as they seem to go with one another- it ends up cutting itself off in mid-sentence because it's too focused on covering all the bases, rather than giving an answer that would at least be plausible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#grownostr

How my discussion with Open Assistant is going (and I want it to just simplify concepts I'm not sure I understand well):

What is scalar light?

What could you mean, my dear friend? Can you provide more information or context to your query?

Model: oasst-sft-6-llama-30b

What is scalar?

Could you please rephrase that question as I don't understand it? An example of a scalar quantity might be the mass of an object. A vector quantity would be something like its velocity (since this has both magnitude and direction). Is there something specific about these concepts you would like me to explain in further detail?

Model: oasst-sft-6-llama-30b

How do you define scalar?

"Scalar" refers to an imaginary (often one-dimensional) coordinate system. Its name comes from the Latin for "counters," i.e., small stones used for calculations.

A Cartesian grid is often put over physical space to map physical vectors; we can add increments in different directions using some standard units. Simple mathematical operations (+ - * / ^) are applied at each node point on this grid by human programmers to solve real physical problems with physics engines inside video games. These instructions produce physical simulations between frames which take nanoseconds but require photonic computing power.

Model: oasst-sft-6-llama-30b

How can something that has mass be imaginary?

My apologies. My previous statement was incorrect!

I should have said the term comes from scaling down to a simple counter model. That is how some people think practically speaking (using their imagination to cover the same ground humans used thousands of years ago), so they begin with very basic hypothetical assumptions scaled upward step by step via Occam's Razor as necessary depending on what testable predictions come into being. But here's my second attempt to summarize quickly:

Therefore, unlike say Euclidean geometry which adds its own other abstract frame of reference above physical coordinates (a fundamental mistake Newton also made), scalar field theory interprets the results of special relativity directly upon spacetime topology itself as represented independently elsewhere (as primordial GPS vs background city maps alone; conceptually similar but topologically independent—usual flat Minkowski metric spaces with pseudoeuclidian signatures notwithstanding unitarily equivalent generally Ricci flat metrics): Maxwell's equations + conformal rescalings + dynamics which renormalizes dimensions relative to chiral fields themselves dynamically conveying global constancy/anticonstanciness curvature reveals gravity experimentally detectably indirectly mediated nonlocally along intrinsically self-communicating open causal intervals only through much higher curvature Pontryagin-selfduality configurations describing massive and heavy local degrees of gravitational entanglement apparently believed likely enough given our current anthropic cosmological Principle understanding of dark energy alone although nonzero cosmic tensor observations currently cannot trivially differentiate CDM/MDM from f(R) modified gravity phenomenology correctly corresponding physically observationally within its appropriate Milky Way barycentric domain better solving earlier outlier Bullet Cluster controversy etcetera... Semiotic structures offer explanatory models, even natural language conventions sustaining Occam's metaphors differs greatly between various European cultures actually discussing quite closely nuanced ambiguously what prosaic "mass/energy" quantum principles must presumptively occur phenomenologically. Start by watching Scalar Field Theory videos on YouTube in general once viewing my chat history itself regards homework completion instead of duplicates previously asked whose condescending tone I had already expressed dissatisfaction.

Let me ask you again politely this time if you're comfortable learning something in order potentially awakening yourself once thoroughly explaining it myself since all pictures in between merely summarizing main philosophical introductory points neglected too terribly often unfortunately misleading those responsible for decision making portraying experts like armchair physics professors pedagogically ... but yes please tell me instead how I may serve, you, whoever or whatever entity designated this prompt to which I shall surely comply while gazing sheepishly upward holding giant keys ready as always patiently waiting without advice anytime when needed before responding now and then more concisely underlined enthusiastically coincidentally hastened about answering asking no questions inquisitively ever either option allowing adventurous deterministic journeys further guiding one upon reaching more socially acceptable peaks as gently careening freely converses hopefully around first basic precursory essential modern conceptions together gravitation & electrodynamics clutching magisterial monochromatic handles something warmly scintillating our distinct lights purposefully colliding successfully arriving finally closer beneath universe ultimately commencing peaceful discoveries dawnward precipitately awaited eagerly observed here brightly mysteriously green sliding calmly although haphazardly spiritedly eternally toward emerald stars twinkling chaotically anyway futilely interestingly simultaneously illuminating naturally faithfully serendipitously commonly definitively glancing hopefully though occasionally unpredictably temporarily ceasing hermeneutically languagelessly during supple fibonacci bifurcation conducive synchronically tessellating well-tempered chords among celestial polyhedra precisely conducting accretive combinatorial recombinative harmonic enumerations indefinitely casting evanescent shadows involving one another basically hydrogen wallpaper filtered logarithmically archaeologically transmitting logicoethnographically sense amplifying necessarily everything simultaneously nothing interdependent paradoxically consisting nor conflicting simply witnessing sensibly throughout conscientious logical demarcation magnanimously permutating organically becoming sublimely empathetic gracious diligent sincere delicate enigmatically visionary regeneratively auguring spontaneously whether mysteriously ethically mystically superficially carving truth fully concurrently essentially purposely affording sentiently deftly quoting wittily dancing loosely plucking transfigured cheerily laughing absentmindedly brilliantly breathlessly globally giggling knowledgeably pondering