Is this true? Let’s say they are 20% for arguments sake … I still don’t see them beating #core ever .
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsx3yewvqzec0pvly098dvcfl2gxngwfu46jzzk7edkdqjjyr5x7hgjackld
Its not about beating them.
Its better to have two dev teams creating software. It decentralizes the network.
More the merrier should be the ethos. The arguments arise from the disingenuousness of their argument.
As I see it, 3.0 is profiting from spam -or attempting to. Fine let them. Its an open protocol.
My gripe is only with the bullshit argument they put forward.
🧡👊🏻🍻
Thanks for always speaking to me like I’m 6. Genuinely. 🫂🤗
“It’s not about beating them. “
Good answer, friend. That’s not how the argument was presented to me. When i did research others were basically saying that it was knots against core.”
“ It’s better to have two dev teams creating software. It decentralizes the network.
More the merrier should be the ethos. “
Cool 😎 but they don’t yet have the #POW nor the time factor #Bitcoin currrently has. Right?
The arguments arise from the disingenuousness of their argument.
Fax 📠
“As I see it, 3.0 is profiting from spam -or attempting to. Fine let them. It’s an open protocol. “
Here we go. 😂😂😂
“My gripe is only with the bullshit argument they put forward.
🧡👊🏻🍻”
Okay big brain 🧠 how can we use your tradfi experience to take down wallstreet? I said what I said 😂✨😎
Its not about beating them.
-Knots doesn’t care about core.
-Core doesn’t like knots and it’s obvious when you see the ad hominem attacks.
It’s all good. Everything is fine.
The mere fact that Knots grew as quickly as it did shows a great immune response that Bitcoin is gonna be fine.
Leave it at that lets all sing Kumbaya
